This story has been deleted or moved to another web site because my minister, Rev. Brian Hamilton told me the secretary of Hon. Tony Ryall wanted to know if I was taking my medication. I told him I'm not required to take any because I don't have any mental illness. In fact, as I told my doctor last Thursday, I had already been treated for not taking my medication for a mental illness I don't have and the manager of Tokonui Hospital Dr Van Der Sluis said I don't have, and suffered a permanent disability as a result, which is why I'm on the invalid's benefit in the first place and seeking an additional 12,000 from the church. She asked me how long ago this was, and I told her 1992.
I'm not sure you have a firm grip on reality, he thought he heard his doctor say.
Maybe you would like to ask one of the people who live at Maketu and who I see regularly whether they think I have a firm grip on reality. Why don't you ask Brian Goldsworthy who lives at the end of our street. I have talked to him at the beach, and stopped when I have been biking around and chatted to him and his friend as they have been going to the cut for a bit of fishing or whitebaiting. I've also spoken to his wife Nicky recently when she was coming back from he bike ride. A few months ago they came up to see if I was OK as I hadn't collected my newspaper for three days, but I was still in bed, and there was nothing wrong with me, I had just been up late working on some writing project or other. I can phone hos phone number through to reception if you want to give him a call, but I'm not taking medication.
He is not a close friend, but he collected my car when I was in Whakatane Hospital, and he gave me a lift home when I was arrested by the Police for trying to rob the BNZ in Te Puke. I had gone in to see why they had closed my account, and instead of reopening it, they had me arrested for threatening to kill the bank teller with a tomahawk. There was a prima facie case, but it was thrown out because I had taken the same tomahawk to the sports shop and to the Mitre 10, and I told the Judge I was trying to buy one exactly like if for my nephew's birthday. It is a drop forged, one piece Eastwing brand, and it is very sharp. I bought it in the USA when I was living there with my girlfriend.
You know this whole thing is political?
How is that?
It is plain because it was Tony Ryall's secretary who approached my minister, about the emails I sent to the minister, and it was he who suggested that I should be on medication and therefore it is because of him that I am here with you at your request. In fact it is because, I believe at least, I sent a letter to the Archbishop of Canterbury accusing the Prime Minister of a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. I spoke about this to Dr Kumar, the doctor who Guardian Trust arranged to visit me at my home, and although he told me it was a letter I sent to McDonald's Corporation, he said, claiming ownership of McDonald's, that caused Guardian Trust to have concerns about my sanity. He could only have found out about that letter from Guardian Trust.
And nobody else?
Or from McDonald's themselves, but how would they have found him? In fact their lawyers wanted to see a copy of my magazine The Journal of Crime and Punishment for themselves, but were not prepared to pay for it so I never sent them one.
And you told them you own McDonald's?
Not directly. What I said is that I own the name Bill Bell, who is the artist who painted a series of plates featuring the McDonald's logo, for Franklin Mint. I said I could not have legally done this unless I had copyright, and I had nothing in writing to confirm this. They said without knowing whether it was true or not that I could not have painted the plates.
What I believe, is that it was the letter I told Dr Kumar about, the one dated 11th June 2009 I sent to John Key and the Minister of Police, asking them to investigate an alleged rape of Judge Annis E Somerville by John Patterson, my lawyer on 27th August 2007 that was the reason I had my property management order extended for another three years in early 2011. I mentioned this letter in a letter to the Archbishop of Canterbury.
And you have evidence of this rape?
No, what I allege is a conversation between the Judge, who heard the property management application by Guardian Trust, and John Patterson, the lawyer who was appointed by the court to act for me. What I said was that he had a conversation with the Judge which she recorded on her dictaphone. In it he told her he was going to have sex with her, and she asked him why he was so confident, to which he replied, "because I have a gun in my pocket" and she then said, "that's good enough for me".
And you say that is rape?
It is if sex took place because he threatened to kill her if it didn't. What I asked the Minister of Police to investigate is whether such a tape exists. I was told that it does, and I asked the Prime Minister Hon John Key M.P. to see why the Minister of Police Hon Judith Collins MP had not bothered to investigate. If he didn't investigate the allegation, he is guilty of a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. That is why this is political.
And the Archbishop of Canterbury knows about this?
He does now, because I sent him a copy of this web address.
Who told you about the dictaphone?
I can't really say, because it may put the person's life at risk if this is true. It may have been the court official who gave me the copy of the court order at the Tauranga High Court. You will note that although the Judge says " This is an application under the Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988 in relation to Malcolm Baker. Today Mr Baker is present in Court and has been able to talk to me about his concerns. He is concerned that he is able to access his funds so that he can have a girlfriend form Europe come out to New Zealand so he can meet her face to face to enable him to make some decisions about his future.
One of the concerns that has been raised byMr Baker was that he was under the impression that the Police were representing him as being under a compulsory treatment order under the Mental Health Compulsory Assessment and Treatment 1992. There has been some discussion about that today and certainly there is nothing before the Court in that regard. He is not under any status of the Mental Health Act."
"He is
told "He is not under any status of the Mental Health Act", the cover sheet of teh Court Order handed down says " NO PUBLICATION OF THIS PROCEEDING IS NOT PERMITTED UNDER S 25
OF THE MENTAL HEALTH (COMPULSORY ASSESSMENT AND
TREATMENT) ACT 1992, EXCEPT WITH THE LEAVE OF THE COURT
THAT HEARD THE PROCEEDINGS, AND WITH THE EXCEPTION OF
PUBLICATION OF BONA FIDE
PROFESSIONAL OR TECHNICAL NATURE."
Note that although I met Sladja online in 2005, and this case was heard in 2007, in 2008 at a Court hearing by Judge Donovan, the 17th January the court is still saying " I have a concern
about his engagement with a woman from the former Yugoslavia with whom
he is in touch through the Internet. I suspect that there are risks
there to Malcolm, and personally I am pleased that his property manager
has declined him access to funds for the purpose of bringing that lady
to New Zealand, however today the application is declined.